Long time I went to visit the forum! I wanted to update one of my old post about contango/backwardation/expected future spot price/roll yield. To be honest, during a lot of time I was very confused by the theory and the possible representations (see graphics below) that a student could find on...
The bond price given in the first tree was obtain using real world probability and discounting it with the 6 months spot rate... So I think that to compute the option price we needed neutral probabilities in order to respect the non arbitrage condition
Yes for raroc I was not sure which one between C and D because both criteria of decision gave a reject it was confusing... and also for the hurdle rate you surely are right I have not practiced this concept enough :/
Now I just hope I can pass this exam :')
For part 1 I thought the cutoff to be low 60 but then it comes to be low 50.. So who knows, I personally think that low 50 will be the cutoff for part 2
Overall I think GARP did a good job to cover a lot of LOs for my exam (30% quant / 70% qualitative)... as many have said before, for a lot of qualitative questions 2 answers seemed ok, so that was a bit frustrating. The CBT format is alright but no score was shown at the end of the exam. So now...
same here i did well on BT mock and very well on garp mock, but knowing garp, I am not sure what to expect on exam day... I think at this point in time, we just have to relax until exam day, the difficult part (the preparation process) is behind us....
cheers
Yes, it seems like a direct application of the merton model, but I think that we should not refer to "market volatility", in fact in P2.T6.403 403.2 it is stated that "higher firm asset volatility" implies higher equity value and lower (senior/junior) debt value..
And also, by logic of the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.