Search results

Yeah !!!!! also I got mine and will mail out my certification on Sep. 30. Thanks David & BT again for offering so useful materials . if possible, I hope you can offer CFA materials in future. THANK YOU again.

Hi Aenny, I posted on edmondclchou, next year give me a message here, Ｇood luck to you, cheer up

I took 3 attemps in FRM II, last year I got the similar goals(2-3-4-4-3) as yours , this year I added Bionic Turtle materials(at first time purchased ) to make-up the 4 huge volumes +current issues with thousands of pages , of course, I got the passing of FRM II (1-3-2-3-2) due to luck enough...

I must work for life daily, am gonna do it in this weekend, will provide you next week. In fact, you two just need to be hard up one or two grades will pass NOV FRMＩＩ

Don't give it up, if you need some support, don't hesitate to call me here, may I squeeze some key test to you. believe yourself in you can obtain enough luck to pass NOV exam.

Count me guys, while waking up , I couldn't believe that I passed the FRM II on my GARP profile, YEAH:p. Appreciated for Bionic Turtle given much useful materials. If you are not luck enough, please not give up next testing examination, after all, we start the key to open FRM door. GOD besides...

GARP has NOT yet published the testing results , same with you is very anxious in this days. Midnight should send the result to me......it's far far far away from my duty off ...Good luck

Sorry for I typing error. correct is 3rd defense line to answer "independent review ", 2nd defense line is ICORF, 1st defense line is line manager.

I remember the question asked for "3rd pillar of Basel ", the answer is independent review. As for ICORF is 2nd defense line

I bear in my mind for your sharing, parts of questions I guessed were wrong, hereby sharing "bogey" about assets allocation & securities selection. In 2014 Nov. issued its concept and this May issues formula . I forgot this issues were calculated assets allocation or securities selection, just...

regarding to "Question on Exposure of $9ook with a $1m threshold and $250k mta, exposure increases to $1.2m, and the outcome. I did not like this question as I thought this should trigger a $1.2m margin call, but that was not an answer. I chose increase $300k but the answer may have been...

I gues sthe same answer , VAR limit on each manager was <100, I guess 84 or 8X, hope both we get the right answer.

I guess ROC due to separting good borrower from bad's

I got the answer but sorry for I forgot, required funding in assets & denominator, the logic is correct. hope both we selcet the right one

I don't know why not allow to take a watch on hand, which is hard to control time for me. And I felt that not be fair with non-english country. 80 questions including senario were not easy to have/ sufficient time to consider per question behind tricky. Long time will wait the testing results.....

I selected the same one the CDS ended at zero because of recallying only VAR & system risk is straightforwad line

I got the answer using the same formula but bb_ I used pd of non investment grade (above bbb_ rated investment grade)

I forgot which one I selected but I thought this is not mbs caused no funding liquidity issue

Nope its not steeper as opposed direction , I just know this is not steeper