Hi asja - For our purposes (all are ETL), CVaR = ES; e.g., 99% CVaR is average loss "in the tail" that exceeds 99%.
"Conditional" is a good name for it: Expected (Loss | Loss > VaR).
David
sorry I did not get it.. are you saying Typically banks estimate risk capital using "ES”? (why?) or you are saying this statement using conditional VaR is problematic?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.