Hello,
I thought the capital risk charge under the IMA approach was simply the higher of the previous day VaR or or the 60 days average VaR multiplied by factor no less than 3 ? Am I getting this wrong?
I am referring to a GARP question from 2011 practice exam:
Given:
The answer for the capital charge to be calculated is:
MAX [40,000 x sqrt(10)/1.65 x 2.326 ; 2 x 25,000 x sqrt(10)/1.65 x 2.326] = 222,893
I am completely confused..... why is it not simply : MAX [40,000 x sqrt(10) ; 3 x 25,000 x sqrt(10)]
Meaning why are they dividing by 1.65 x 2.326? Where is 2.326 coming from? And I also thought the multiplication factor was subject to a floor of 3, so if given something lower, we need to use at least 3?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Glen
I thought the capital risk charge under the IMA approach was simply the higher of the previous day VaR or or the 60 days average VaR multiplied by factor no less than 3 ? Am I getting this wrong?
I am referring to a GARP question from 2011 practice exam:
Given:
- VaR (95%, 1-day) of last trading day = 40,000
- Average VaR (95%, 1-day) for last 60 trading days = 25,000
- Multiplication factor = 2
The answer for the capital charge to be calculated is:
MAX [40,000 x sqrt(10)/1.65 x 2.326 ; 2 x 25,000 x sqrt(10)/1.65 x 2.326] = 222,893
I am completely confused..... why is it not simply : MAX [40,000 x sqrt(10) ; 3 x 25,000 x sqrt(10)]
Meaning why are they dividing by 1.65 x 2.326? Where is 2.326 coming from? And I also thought the multiplication factor was subject to a floor of 3, so if given something lower, we need to use at least 3?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Glen