Incremental VaR using Beta Co-efficient

Hi David,

Could you please justify on how to calculate Incremental VaR using Beta.

A $20 million portfolio consists of only two equally-weighted and uncorrelated positions in Asset A & B. Asset A ($10 million) has a volatility of 10% and Asset B (also @10 million) has a volatility of 20%. At 99% confidence, what is an approximation of incremental VaR given an additional investment of $1 million in Asset B?

A) $233,000
B) $298,000
C) 333,000
D) 416,000


Thanks in Advanced
Rahul
 

David Harper CFA FRM

David Harper CFA FRM
Subscriber
Hi Rahul, that is a *tough* practice question

beta (b, P) = Cov(b,P)/Var(P) = [Cov(b,0.5a + 0.5b)]/Var(P) = 0.5Cov(b,b)/Var(P) = 0.5Var(b)/Var(P) = 0.5*20%^2/[0.0125]
= 1.6 beta of asset B with respect to portfolio

Marginal Var = is only a linear approxation for Incremental VaR, the writer is accurate to use "approximation" ! = potfolio VaR/Portfolio Value * beta
(see Jorion Chapter 7 or see here)

= [(portfolio volatility)(2.33 normal deviate @ 99%)]/$20 million * 1.6 beta = about 416,000

David
 
Hi David,

David you are very clear in explaining the Beta of 1.6, but there are few more doubts to be unleash.

Thanks for that speedy respond, however i want to understand couple on things which looks to be hidded in your explanation. Would appreciate veery much if can throw some light.

When you took 0.50 as common = [Cov(b,0.5a + 0.5b)]/Var(P)
1) You got the below, but how does 0.50a disappear ?
= 0.5Cov(b,b)/Var(P),
2) Another doubt = 0.5Var(b)/Var(P) = 0.5*20%^2/[0.0125]
How did you arrive at Var(P) = 0.0125 ?
3) = [(portfolio volatility)(2.33 normal deviate @ 99%)]/$20 million * 1.6 beta = about 416,000
In the above what is Portfolio Volatility?

David you are very clear in explaining the Beta of 1.6, but still there are few more doubts.
 

David Harper CFA FRM

David Harper CFA FRM
Subscriber
Hi Rahul,

Sorry, beta is the hardest part of that:

1. drops out b/c correlation = 0
[Cov(b,0.5a + 0.5b)]
= 0.5Cov(b,a) + 0.5Cov(b,b), since the correlation(a,b) = 0, and Cov() = Corr()*Std()*Std(), the Cov(a,b) = 0,
so 0.5Cov(b,a) = 0.5*Corr(a,b)*StdDev(a)*StdDev(b) = 0 b/c Corr(a,b) = 0

2. This is two-asset portfolio variance, it *should* be memorized for the exam

=w^2*variance(a) + w^2*variance(b) + (2)(w)(w)Covariance(a,b)
=50%^2*10%^2 + 50%^2*20^2 + (2)(50%)(50%)(covariance = 0)
= 0.0125

3. portfolio volatiliy = SQRT[portfolio variance]
volatility% = SQRT[0.0125] = 11.18%
volatility$ = % * $20 MM = 2.23 MMM

David
 
Hi David,

That was the toughest one to understand, but you made it so clear & easy thru detail explanation.

There is another way which was still not clear to me.

($5.20 = Portfolio VaR)/($20 Portfolio)*(1.6 = Beta) = 0.4161. Beta part is explained by you, which is now resolved,
However there is another method which have been applied ($.40)/($2.24)*2.326 = 0.416, how this $.40 is coming inn (Clueless). $2.24 is portfolio volatility sqrt(5), which is ($10^2)(10%^2) + ($10^2)(20%^2) = $5, 2.326 is critical Z value @ pp% confidence.

How they got $.40 ?

A sincere thanks for your help david.
Rahul
 

David Harper CFA FRM

David Harper CFA FRM
Subscriber
Hi Rahul,

Yea, I had to look that up, having forgotten the other marginal VaR formula.
Under Jorion page 168, marginal VaR also = (normal deviate)*Covariance$[B, P]/Portfolio Volatility$.
(dollar covariance as opposed to % covariance above)
Just as you have: ($.40)/($2.24)*2.326 = 0.416, so the $0.40 is dollar covariance

as in: Cov()*$20 = (0.5*20%^2)*$20 = $0.4
or in matrix form, per Jorion page 171: (sigma)X = 0*$10+20%^2*$10 = $0.40
I personally find this more difficult here in the 2-asset case, but this is following the alternative formula (Jorion 7.17):
marginal VaR = deviate*Covariance(security, portfolio)/Volatility(portfolio)

Note the difference from above, in this Covariance and volatility are in dollar ($) terms so they cancel to give the unitless marginal VaR.
The way i did above, the dollars didn't enter until the last step, when they also cancelled

Hope that helps....David
 
:) David, you are a Legend.

You explained it so well & clear my all concepts pertaining to Beta & Incremental VaR. Thanks a lot for solving that out.

Thanks
Rahul
 
Top