Hello,
There is a statement about liquidity risks that I am havgin trouble wrapping my head around. Thus is talking about OTC markets:
Many different matching exposures increases market depth and decreases liquidity risk. A problem arises when there are huge risk concentrations that provide the market depth, thereby increasing liquidity risk.
What exactly is this trying to say?
Also, in the same chapter the cost of liquidity is measured as:
Liquidation value - mark to market value
Since the Liquidation value is presumably less than the Mark to market value, would this term be negative?
The idea is simple enough, but the signs of a lot of these metrics is really inconsistent, especially because of all of the different authors.
Thanks!
Shannon
There is a statement about liquidity risks that I am havgin trouble wrapping my head around. Thus is talking about OTC markets:
Many different matching exposures increases market depth and decreases liquidity risk. A problem arises when there are huge risk concentrations that provide the market depth, thereby increasing liquidity risk.
What exactly is this trying to say?
Also, in the same chapter the cost of liquidity is measured as:
Liquidation value - mark to market value
Since the Liquidation value is presumably less than the Mark to market value, would this term be negative?
The idea is simple enough, but the signs of a lot of these metrics is really inconsistent, especially because of all of the different authors.
Thanks!
Shannon