I couldn't understand the difference between margined and non margined counterparties. I know that margined counterpaty is the one that uses a margined agreement. Am I right?
I'm not fluent with "margined counterparty" as a technical phrase (context?), I would just assume that it refers to a counterparty who must post margin per a collateral agreement (either unilaterally, or bilaterally). I mean, if Bank A has an OTC position with Counterparty B, then Bank A incurs credit exposure (e.g., PFE) on gains in its position, and Bank A mitigates its counterparty exposure to Counterparty B when B must post collateral when B's MTM position experiences losses. So, I would *think* that, from A's perspective, B is the margined counterparty. Thanks,
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.