Finding N(-d1)

skoh

Member
Hi,

I'm referring to Hull, Chapters 11,13 & 17, question 13.04, how do we actually get 0.4045 for N(-d1)?

Thanks
 

ShaktiRathore

Well-Known Member
Subscriber
Go to cumulative normal distribution table with negative values of z on left of table. And if value z=-1.65 then look for -1.6 in row and corresponding to this row look fr column .05 and get the corresponding value for z=-1.65.
Alternatively Go to cumulative normal distribution table with positive values of z on left of table. And if value z=1.65 then look for 1.6 in row and corresponding to this row look fr column .05 and get the corresponding value for z=1.65.use the relation N(-1.65)=1-N(1.65)
For higher precision of decimals do following:
Go to cumulative normal distribution table with negative values of z on left of table. And if value z=-1.655 then look for -1.6 in row and corresponding to this row look fr columns with value .05 and .06 now take the mean of two values to get the value for z=-1.655.
Alternatively Go to cumulative normal distribution table with positive values of z on left of table. And if value z=1.655 then look for 1.6 in row and corresponding to this row look fr columns with value .05 and .06 now take the mean of two values to get the value for z=1.655. now to get N(-1.655) use the relation N(-1.655)=1-N(1.655).
e.g. to calculate N(1.667) you can use the formula as
xN(1.66)+(1-x)N(1.67) calculate x as: 1.66x+1.67(1-x)=1.667=>.01x=1.67-1.667=.003=> x=.3 so
N(1.667) =.3N(1.66)+(.7)N(1.67)
you can use similar procedure to calculate to any places of decimals the values of N(z) approximately.

thanks
 

noalv4

Member
Hi,
Regarding this qoestion...
Are we going to receive the cumulative normal distribution table in the FRM exam?

Thanks,
Noa
 
Top