FRM Fun 13 (this is a P2 FRM question but P1 candidates are welcome to try)
Today's question isn't really fun, but it has been asked literally dozens of times in various guise since I started the forum. A "star" goes to the most helpful answer.
Despite its weaknesses, value-at-risk (VaR) is the most prominent risk measure in the FRM curriculum. Because VaR, as a worst expected loss, associates with a time horizon (and a confidence level), the "drift" of an exposure factors into the worst expected loss. For example, if my I expect my portfolio to gain by +$2 over the month, but its worst expected loss is $10, I can either include or exclude the expected gain in a VaR number. In an equities portfolio, drift is the positive return we expect over time.
Several authors reflect this distinction--i.e., to include or exclude the drift-- by specifying an "absolute VaR" or a "relative VaR."
Two questions (both are FRM P2 although UL makes an appearance in P1) :
Today's question isn't really fun, but it has been asked literally dozens of times in various guise since I started the forum. A "star" goes to the most helpful answer.
Despite its weaknesses, value-at-risk (VaR) is the most prominent risk measure in the FRM curriculum. Because VaR, as a worst expected loss, associates with a time horizon (and a confidence level), the "drift" of an exposure factors into the worst expected loss. For example, if my I expect my portfolio to gain by +$2 over the month, but its worst expected loss is $10, I can either include or exclude the expected gain in a VaR number. In an equities portfolio, drift is the positive return we expect over time.
Several authors reflect this distinction--i.e., to include or exclude the drift-- by specifying an "absolute VaR" or a "relative VaR."
Two questions (both are FRM P2 although UL makes an appearance in P1) :
- What is the relationship among relative VaR, absolute VaR and unexpected loss (UL)?
- Under the Basel method, the three big risk buckets are market, credit, and operational risk.
What is the presumed (i.e., default or assumed) VaR for each risk bucket; e.g., are they each absolute VaRs? are they each relative VaRs? Put another way, can we identify a conclusive set of presumed VaRs for:
- Credit risk
- Market risk
- Operational risk